Are trade shows still worth it?

It's 2026, and trade show season is in full swing. For most building product manufacturers, the debate around trade shows has changed. It’s no longer “are trade shows dead?”—a question that lingered after COVID. The question now is whether investments in trade shows are still worth it. The market has slowed. Budgets are tighter. Scrutiny is higher. And every major marketing line item now has to compete with digital channels that promise cleaner attribution and faster feedback loops. Trade shows haven’t been exempt from that pressure—but they have been reshaped by it.

Have a challenge? A vision? A brand that’s ready for more? let’s talk

The manufacturers still investing confidently aren’t doing so out of habit. They’re doing it because the channel continues to deliver—when it’s treated with the same rigor as the rest of the marketing mix. And the data backs that up. 

What the post-COVID rebound actually looks like 

In 2020, the U.S. exhibition industry didn’t decline—it came to a complete halt. According to the Center for Exhibition Industry Research (CEIR), 100% of exhibitions were cancelled in Q2 2020, creating a disruption that distorted perceptions for years to come.

Fast-forward to today and the recovery is unmistakable.

By Q4 2024, the CEIR Total Index—which tracks exhibit space, exhibitors, attendance and revenue—had rebounded to 95.6% of pre-pandemic levels, narrowing the year-over-year gap rapidly. Exhibitor participation is the most recovered metric, sitting just 0.1% below 2019, while attendance continues to rebound more selectively. By Q2 2025, 39.3% of events in the Index sample exceeded their pre-pandemic CEIR Total Index performance, up from 37.3% in Q3 2024.

That pattern holds at the industry level—but what does it look like in building product and adjacent shows?

At the International Builders’ Show (IBS) 2025, attendance exceeded 81,000 builders, remodelers, developers and other home building professionals, making it the largest IBS in 17 years, with more than 1,800 exhibiting companies and a show floor that expanded year over year. Similar or better attendance is expected when the show heads to Orlando, Florida in February 2026.

Co-located with IBS, Kitchen & Bath Industry Show (KBIS) welcomed 43,000+ visitors and nearly 700 exhibitors in 2025, reinforcing the 30% increase in exhibitors they achieved in 2024, within a broader Design & Construction Week audience of over 124,000 registered attendees.

In roofing and architecture, the recovery is even more clear.

Across categories, the pattern is consistent: exhibitors returned faster than overall attendance, while attendee quality improved even where totals remain slightly below 2019. That distinction matters. Trade shows only exist if manufacturers fund them—and manufacturers came back because the channel continued to deliver real value, even during the recovery.

Why trade shows still matter in building products 

Building products are physical, technical and specified and installed by humans. Trade shows remain one of the few environments where manufacturers can:

  • Demonstrate products and systems at scale (real products that visitors can see and feel)
  • Introduce new products with a splash (customers and media in one place for maximum impact)
  • Handle technical questions in real time (human-to-human interaction in the booth)
  • Influence the whole channel simultaneously (contractors, builders, dealers, distributors, architects, specifiers, etc.)
  • Build confidence that carries through long sales cycles (when projects take nine months or longer, annual in-person touchpoints are especially valuable)

Digital marketing supports this work. And it's still an important part of the marketing mix. But it doesn’t replace the in-person experience that trade shows provide.

That’s why some manufacturers are increasingly treating trade shows as a high-intent conversion layer inside a broader marketing system—where digital channels create demand, trade shows concentrate engagement and post-show nurture converts interest into revenue. 

The reason some manufacturers fail to prove ROI 

When trade show participation underperforms, it’s rarely because the show itself failed. It’s more likely that:

  • Success wasn’t clearly defined up front
  • The booth tried to do too much or was poorly designed
  • Booth staff were undertrained, unprepared or misaligned with the show’s goals
  • Sales team alignment happened too late—or not at all
  • Leads were captured without context or a plan for follow-up
  • Show follow-up was slow, generic, inconsistent or nonexistent

The result is predictable: lots of activity, little clarity and a tough budget conversation afterward. When this happens, the issue usually isn’t a lack of ROI—it’s a lack of structure to capture, measure and communicate it.

How manufacturers are proving trade show ROI today 

Manufacturers that continue to invest confidently in trade shows approach them less like events and more like integrated growth initiatives.

  1. They define ROI before anything is designed. Before a booth layout or sponsorship is approved, they clearly outline what success means for this show: priority meetings booked, specifier conversations, dealer engagement, pipeline influence or content created. Lead volume alone isn’t the goal.
  2. They integrate trade shows into the broader marketing system. Digital marketing creates awareness, excitement and demand ahead of the show. Trade shows concentrate on live demos and high-intent conversations. Post-show campaigns nurture those interactions into revenue. The show isn’t standalone—it’s a conversion layer.
  3. They align with sales teams early on who matters and what qualifies. Sales and marketing teams agree upfront on target accounts, roles and what constitutes a meaningful conversation. That alignment prevents the common post-show breakdown where marketing celebrates activity and sales questions lead quality.
  4. They capture context, not just badge scans. Who the person is, why they stopped, what they care about and where they are in the buying process matters more than how many badges were scanned. Context is what turns leads into actionable opportunities.
  5. They use AI to remove friction, not replace judgment. AI is applied where it saves time—creating booth talking points grounded in brand and product messaging, summarizing booth conversations, transcribing interviews, drafting follow-ups and repurposing content—so teams can move faster without losing the human nuance that builds trust.
  6. They report outcomes leadership actually cares about. Instead of vanity metrics like number of booth attendees and badges scanned, they connect the show to real business impact: pipeline influenced, dealer confidence improved, specifier momentum gained and insights applied to future launches or programs.

The common thread is intent. When trade shows are planned, integrated and measured this way, the ROI conversation doesn’t need to be defensive—it becomes easier to demonstrate. 

Closing thought 

Trade shows can still earn their place in the marketing budget, but not by default. And not because “this is how we’ve always done it.”

The post-COVID reset and today’s softer market didn’t weaken the channel. They raised the bar. Trade shows now have to be planned intentionally, integrated with the rest of the marketing mix and held to the same performance standards as every other investment.

For building product manufacturers willing to do that work—align teams early, focus on the right audiences and measure what matters—trade shows remain one of the few channels that combine scale, in-person engagement, trust-building and real-world impact in a way few other investments can.

They also benefit from a quieter shift that’s hard to ignore: as work, buying and communication become more digital and more fragmented, people increasingly value moments that are physical, focused and human. Trade shows create rare space for real conversations, hands-on experience and uninterrupted attention—things digital channels struggle to replicate.

Trade shows haven’t disappeared or lost their role. They’ve become more accountable—and more valuable for marketers who understand both the business case and the human one.

This post is an updated version of Kyle’s article originally published on LinkedIn.   

Have a challenge? A vision? A brand that’s ready for more? let’s talk

More Good Reads